Repository navigation
1347 lines (1226 loc) · 71.2 KB
/
Copy pathcode-review-runner.yml
File metadata and controls
1347 lines (1226 loc) · 71.2 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
name: Code Review Runner
on:
issue_comment:
types: [created]
workflow_dispatch:
inputs:
runtime_canary:
description: Test the staged Codex package without submitting a review.
required: false
type: boolean
default: false
pr_number:
required: false
type: string
head_sha:
required: false
type: string
base_sha:
required: false
type: string
review_focus:
required: false
type: string
default: ''
manage_status:
description: Update the code-review commit status from this run.
required: false
type: boolean
default: true
permissions:
statuses: write
pull-requests: write
contents: read
issues: write
# One review-step budget for helper download, all attempts, and final verification.
env:
REVIEW_TIMEOUT_MINUTES: 120
jobs:
runtime-canary:
if: ${{ github.event_name == 'workflow_dispatch' && inputs.runtime_canary == true }}
runs-on: ubuntu-24.04
timeout-minutes: 25
permissions:
contents: read
steps:
- name: Install ossutil
run: |
tmp_dir="$(mktemp -d)"
trap 'rm -rf "$tmp_dir"' EXIT
curl -fsSL -o "$tmp_dir/ossutil.zip" https://gosspublic.alicdn.com/ossutil/1.7.19/ossutil-v1.7.19-linux-amd64.zip
unzip -q "$tmp_dir/ossutil.zip" -d "$tmp_dir"
sudo install -m 0755 "$tmp_dir/ossutil-v1.7.19-linux-amd64/ossutil" /usr/local/bin/ossutil
- name: Install staged Codex package
env:
OSS_AK: ${{ secrets.OSS_AK }}
OSS_SK: ${{ secrets.OSS_SK }}
OSS_ENDPOINT: oss-cn-hongkong.aliyuncs.com
run: |
set -euo pipefail
archive="$RUNNER_TEMP/codex-exec-goal.tar.gz"
package="$RUNNER_TEMP/codex-exec-goal"
ossutil -i "$OSS_AK" -k "$OSS_SK" -e "$OSS_ENDPOINT" \
cp -f oss://doris-community-ci/codex/releases/codex-exec-goal-0.162.1-3547e9086675-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.gz "$archive"
echo "51304e4f9c343ae84e00a304344df41c2fd32821c83bdbf5be68b0f0c25ddae1 $archive" | sha256sum --check
mkdir -p "$package"
tar -xzf "$archive" -C "$package"
(cd "$package" && sha256sum --check SHA256SUMS)
test "$(jq -r .version "$package/codex-package.json")" = 0.162.1
"$package/bin/codex" --version
"$package/bin/codex" exec --help | grep -q -- '--goal'
echo "CODEX_CANARY_BIN=$package/bin/codex" >> "$GITHUB_ENV"
- name: Load one review auth snapshot
id: auth
env:
OSS_AK: ${{ secrets.OSS_AK }}
OSS_SK: ${{ secrets.OSS_SK }}
OSS_ENDPOINT: oss-cn-hongkong.aliyuncs.com
run: |
set -euo pipefail
umask 077
home="$RUNNER_TEMP/codex-canary-home"
install -m 700 -d "$home"
ossutil -i "$OSS_AK" -k "$OSS_SK" -e "$OSS_ENDPOINT" \
cp -f oss://doris-community-ci/codex/auth.json.4 "$home/auth.json" >/dev/null
jq -e '
.auth_mode == "chatgpt"
and (.tokens.access_token | type == "string" and length > 0)
and (.tokens.refresh_token | type == "string" and length > 0)
' "$home/auth.json" >/dev/null
sha256sum "$home/auth.json" | awk '{print $1}' \
> "$RUNNER_TEMP/codex-canary-auth-original.sha256"
cat > "$home/config.toml" <<'EOF'
cli_auth_credentials_store = "file"
approval_policy = "never"
[features]
memories = true
[memories]
use_memories = true
generate_memories = true
[otel]
environment = "github-actions"
exporter = "none"
trace_exporter = "none"
metrics_exporter = "none"
EOF
echo "CODEX_HOME=$home" >> "$GITHUB_ENV"
- name: Test ChatGPT model access and goal mode without GitHub writes
timeout-minutes: 18
run: |
set -uo pipefail
run_model() {
local label="$1" model="$2" goal="$3" effort="${4:-low}"
local events="$RUNNER_TEMP/codex-canary-$label.jsonl"
local final="$RUNNER_TEMP/codex-canary-$label.txt"
local args=(exec --skip-git-repo-check --json --model "$model"
--config "model_reasoning_effort=$effort" --sandbox read-only
--color never --output-last-message "$final")
if [ "$goal" = true ]; then
args+=(--goal)
fi
local prompt="Reply with exactly OK. Do not access files or external services."
if [ "$goal" = true ]; then
prompt="Create a goal to reply OK, mark it complete, then reply OK. Do not access files or external services."
fi
timeout --signal=INT --kill-after=10s 180s \
env -u GH_TOKEN -u GITHUB_TOKEN "$CODEX_CANARY_BIN" \
"${args[@]}" "$prompt" > "$events" 2> "$RUNNER_TEMP/codex-canary-$label.stderr"
local status=$?
echo "$label: exit_status=$status"
jq -r 'select(.type == "turn.failed" or .type == "error") |
.error.message // .message // empty' "$events" | tail -n 2 || true
if [ "$status" -ne 0 ] ||
! jq -e 'select(.type == "turn.completed")' "$events" >/dev/null; then
return 1
fi
return 0
}
run_model sol gpt-6-sol false
sol_status=$?
run_model prior-sol gpt-5.6-sol false
prior_status=$?
goal_status=1
if [ "$sol_status" -eq 0 ]; then
run_model sol-goal gpt-6-sol true
goal_status=$?
fi
run_model sol61 gpt-6.1-sol false xhigh
sol61_status=$?
sol61_goal_status=1
if [ "$sol61_status" -eq 0 ]; then
run_model sol61-goal gpt-6.1-sol true xhigh
sol61_goal_status=$?
fi
echo "model_canary: gpt-6-sol=$sol_status gpt-5.6-sol=$prior_status gpt-6-sol-goal=$goal_status gpt-6.1-sol-xhigh=$sol61_status gpt-6.1-sol-xhigh-goal=$sol61_goal_status"
test "$sol_status" -eq 0 && test "$goal_status" -eq 0 && \
test "$sol61_status" -eq 0 && test "$sol61_goal_status" -eq 0
- name: Sync refreshed canary auth
if: ${{ always() && steps.auth.outcome == 'success' }}
env:
OSS_AK: ${{ secrets.OSS_AK }}
OSS_SK: ${{ secrets.OSS_SK }}
OSS_ENDPOINT: oss-cn-hongkong.aliyuncs.com
run: |
set -euo pipefail
auth_object=oss://doris-community-ci/codex/auth.json.4
jq -e '
.auth_mode == "chatgpt"
and (.tokens.access_token | type == "string" and length > 0)
and (.tokens.refresh_token | type == "string" and length > 0)
' "$CODEX_HOME/auth.json" >/dev/null
original_hash="$(cat "$RUNNER_TEMP/codex-canary-auth-original.sha256")"
local_hash="$(sha256sum "$CODEX_HOME/auth.json" | awk '{print $1}')"
if [ "$local_hash" = "$original_hash" ]; then
echo "Canary auth was unchanged."
exit 0
fi
remote_auth="$(mktemp "$RUNNER_TEMP/codex-canary-current.XXXXXX")"
trap 'rm -f "$remote_auth"' EXIT
ossutil -i "$OSS_AK" -k "$OSS_SK" -e "$OSS_ENDPOINT" \
cp -f "$auth_object" "$remote_auth" >/dev/null
remote_hash="$(sha256sum "$remote_auth" | awk '{print $1}')"
if [ "$remote_hash" != "$original_hash" ]; then
echo "::error::Auth changed concurrently; refusing to overwrite it."
exit 1
fi
ossutil -i "$OSS_AK" -k "$OSS_SK" -e "$OSS_ENDPOINT" \
cp -f "$CODEX_HOME/auth.json" "$auth_object" >/dev/null
echo "Synced refreshed canary auth."
code-review:
runs-on: ubuntu-24.04
# Serialize actual reviews of a PR, including comment and dispatch triggers.
# Keep every pending request rather than replacing the previous queued job.
concurrency:
group: code-review-pr-${{ github.event.issue.number || inputs.pr_number || github.run_id }}
cancel-in-progress: false
queue: max
outputs:
base_sha: ${{ steps.review_inputs.outputs.base_sha }}
head_sha: ${{ steps.review_inputs.outputs.head_sha }}
manage_status: ${{ steps.review_inputs.outputs.manage_status }}
review_state: ${{ steps.review.outputs.review_state }}
pr_number: ${{ steps.review_inputs.outputs.pr_number }}
# Pre-finalization steps can use 220 minutes and auth sync can use 8 more,
# leaving 10 minutes for runner setup and post-job cleanup.
timeout-minutes: 238
if: >-
inputs.runtime_canary != true &&
(
inputs.pr_number != '' ||
(
github.event_name == 'issue_comment' &&
github.event.issue.pull_request &&
startsWith(github.event.comment.body, '/review') &&
(
github.event.comment.author_association == 'MEMBER' ||
github.event.comment.author_association == 'OWNER' ||
github.event.comment.author_association == 'COLLABORATOR'
)
)
)
steps:
# Keep the trusted helper outside the PR checkout; capture the first API failure too.
- name: Checkout trusted GitHub API diagnostics
timeout-minutes: 2
uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
ref: ${{ github.workflow_sha || github.sha }}
persist-credentials: false
path: .review-api-source
sparse-checkout: .github/scripts/review_github_api.py
sparse-checkout-cone-mode: false
- name: Install GitHub API diagnostics
timeout-minutes: 1
run: |
install -m 700 .review-api-source/.github/scripts/review_github_api.py "$RUNNER_TEMP/review_github_api.py"
gh --version
printf 'REVIEW_GH_VERSION=%s\n' "$(gh --version | sed -n '1p')" >> "$GITHUB_ENV"
printf 'REVIEW_GH_HELPER=%s\n' "$RUNNER_TEMP/review_github_api.py" >> "$GITHUB_ENV"
printf 'REVIEW_GITHUB_DIAGNOSTICS_DIR=%s\n' "$RUNNER_TEMP/review-github-diagnostics" >> "$GITHUB_ENV"
- name: Resolve review inputs
id: review_inputs
timeout-minutes: 2
env:
GH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
EVENT_NAME: ${{ github.event_name }}
ISSUE_NUMBER: ${{ github.event.issue.number }}
COMMENT_BODY: ${{ github.event.comment.body }}
INPUT_PR_NUMBER: ${{ inputs.pr_number }}
INPUT_HEAD_SHA: ${{ inputs.head_sha }}
INPUT_BASE_SHA: ${{ inputs.base_sha }}
INPUT_REVIEW_FOCUS: ${{ inputs.review_focus }}
INPUT_MANAGE_STATUS: ${{ inputs.manage_status }}
REPO: ${{ github.repository }}
run: |
if [ -n "$INPUT_PR_NUMBER" ]; then
PR_NUMBER="$INPUT_PR_NUMBER"
HEAD_SHA="$INPUT_HEAD_SHA"
BASE_SHA="$INPUT_BASE_SHA"
REVIEW_FOCUS="$INPUT_REVIEW_FOCUS"
MANAGE_STATUS="$INPUT_MANAGE_STATUS"
elif [ "$EVENT_NAME" = "issue_comment" ]; then
PR_NUMBER="$ISSUE_NUMBER"
PR_JSON="$(python3 "$REVIEW_GH_HELPER" api "repos/${REPO}/pulls/${PR_NUMBER}")"
HEAD_SHA="$(jq -er '.head.sha' <<<"$PR_JSON")"
BASE_SHA="$(jq -er '.base.sha' <<<"$PR_JSON")"
REVIEW_FOCUS="$(printf '%s' "${COMMENT_BODY#'/review'}" |
python3 -c 'import sys; sys.stdout.write(sys.stdin.read().lstrip())')"
MANAGE_STATUS=true
else
echo "Review inputs are unavailable for event '$EVENT_NAME'." >&2
exit 1
fi
test -n "$PR_NUMBER"
test -n "$HEAD_SHA"
test -n "$BASE_SHA"
if [ "$MANAGE_STATUS" = "true" ]; then
PR_JSON="${PR_JSON:-$(python3 "$REVIEW_GH_HELPER" api "repos/${REPO}/pulls/${PR_NUMBER}")}"
LIVE_HEAD_SHA="$(jq -er '.head.sha' <<<"$PR_JSON")"
LIVE_BASE_SHA="$(jq -er '.base.sha' <<<"$PR_JSON")"
if [ "$LIVE_HEAD_SHA" != "$HEAD_SHA" ] || [ "$LIVE_BASE_SHA" != "$BASE_SHA" ]; then
echo "Refusing to update status for a PR/head/base mismatch." >&2
echo "Declared base/head: $BASE_SHA $HEAD_SHA" >&2
echo "Current base/head: $LIVE_BASE_SHA $LIVE_HEAD_SHA" >&2
exit 1
fi
fi
echo "pr_number=$PR_NUMBER" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
echo "head_sha=$HEAD_SHA" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
echo "base_sha=$BASE_SHA" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
echo "manage_status=$MANAGE_STATUS" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
focus_delimiter="review_focus_${RANDOM}_${RANDOM}"
{
echo "review_focus<<${focus_delimiter}"
printf '%s\n' "$REVIEW_FOCUS"
echo "${focus_delimiter}"
} >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
- name: Mark Code Review status as pending
if: ${{ steps.review_inputs.outputs.manage_status == 'true' }}
timeout-minutes: 2
env:
BASE_SHA: ${{ steps.review_inputs.outputs.base_sha }}
GH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
HEAD_SHA: ${{ steps.review_inputs.outputs.head_sha }}
PR_NUMBER: ${{ steps.review_inputs.outputs.pr_number }}
REPO: ${{ github.repository }}
run: |
python3 "$REVIEW_GH_HELPER" api "repos/${REPO}/statuses/${HEAD_SHA}" \
-X POST \
-f state='pending' \
-f context='code-review' \
-f description="Automated review is running for PR #${PR_NUMBER}." \
-f target_url="${{ github.server_url }}/${{ github.repository }}/actions/runs/${{ github.run_id }}"
source_context="code-review/source/automated/pr-${PR_NUMBER}/base-${BASE_SHA}"
python3 "$REVIEW_GH_HELPER" api "repos/${REPO}/statuses/${HEAD_SHA}" \
-X POST \
-f state='pending' \
-f context="$source_context" \
-f description="Automated review is running for PR #${PR_NUMBER} at ${BASE_SHA:0:12}." \
-f target_url="${{ github.server_url }}/${{ github.repository }}/actions/runs/${{ github.run_id }}"
- name: Checkout repository
timeout-minutes: 10
uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
ref: ${{ steps.review_inputs.outputs.head_sha }}
fetch-depth: 0
- name: Install ripgrep
timeout-minutes: 5
run: |
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install -y ripgrep
- name: Install ossutil
timeout-minutes: 5
run: |
tmp_dir="$(mktemp -d)"
trap 'rm -rf "$tmp_dir"' EXIT
curl -fsSL -o "$tmp_dir/ossutil.zip" https://gosspublic.alicdn.com/ossutil/1.7.19/ossutil-v1.7.19-linux-amd64.zip
unzip -q "$tmp_dir/ossutil.zip" -d "$tmp_dir"
sudo install -m 0755 "$tmp_dir/ossutil-v1.7.19-linux-amd64/ossutil" /usr/local/bin/ossutil
- name: Install pinned Codex package
timeout-minutes: 10
run: |
set -euo pipefail
archive="$RUNNER_TEMP/codex-exec-goal.tar.gz"
package="$RUNNER_TEMP/codex-exec-goal"
ossutil -i "$OSS_AK" -k "$OSS_SK" -e "$OSS_ENDPOINT" \
cp -f "$OSS_CODEX_PACKAGE_OBJECT" "$archive"
echo "51304e4f9c343ae84e00a304344df41c2fd32821c83bdbf5be68b0f0c25ddae1 $archive" | sha256sum --check
mkdir -p "$package"
tar -xzf "$archive" -C "$package"
(cd "$package" && sha256sum --check SHA256SUMS)
test "$(jq -r .version "$package/codex-package.json")" = 0.162.1
echo "$package/bin" >> "$GITHUB_PATH"
env:
OSS_AK: ${{ secrets.OSS_AK }}
OSS_SK: ${{ secrets.OSS_SK }}
OSS_ENDPOINT: oss-cn-hongkong.aliyuncs.com
OSS_CODEX_PACKAGE_OBJECT: oss://doris-community-ci/codex/releases/codex-exec-goal-0.162.1-3547e9086675-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.gz
- name: Verify pinned Codex runtime
timeout-minutes: 2
run: |
set -euo pipefail
codex_cmd="$(command -v codex)"
test "$(readlink -f "$codex_cmd")" = "$RUNNER_TEMP/codex-exec-goal/bin/codex"
echo "a0d5ec053074d66570aa967129d350541f344f76671a199b5a7bc0d45366cdf7 $codex_cmd" | sha256sum --check
codex --version
codex exec --help | grep -q -- '--goal'
codex exec --goal resume --help >/dev/null
- name: Configure Codex auth
id: auth
timeout-minutes: 5
run: |
set -o pipefail
install -m 700 -d "$RUNNER_TEMP/codex-home"
printf 'CODEX_HOME=%s\n' "$RUNNER_TEMP/codex-home" >> "$GITHUB_ENV"
auth_prefix='oss://doris-community-ci/codex/auth.json.'
auth_listing="$(mktemp "$RUNNER_TEMP/codex-auth-objects.XXXXXX")"
if ! ossutil -i "$OSS_AK" -k "$OSS_SK" -e "$OSS_ENDPOINT" ls "$auth_prefix" -s > "$auth_listing"; then
auth_failure_reason="Failed to list Codex review auth objects from OSS."
echo "failure_reason=$auth_failure_reason" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
echo "::error::$auth_failure_reason"
exit 1
fi
auth_candidates="$(mktemp "$RUNNER_TEMP/codex-auth-candidates.XXXXXX")"
awk '$0 ~ /^oss:\/\/doris-community-ci\/codex\/auth\.json\.[0-9]+$/ { print }' \
"$auth_listing" > "$auth_candidates"
if [ ! -s "$auth_candidates" ]; then
auth_failure_reason="No numbered Codex review auth objects were found in OSS."
echo "failure_reason=$auth_failure_reason" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
echo "::error::$auth_failure_reason"
exit 1
fi
auth_object=""
earliest_retry_after_epoch=""
now_epoch="$(date +%s)"
while IFS= read -r candidate; do
context_file="$(mktemp "$RUNNER_TEMP/codex-auth-context.XXXXXX")"
if ossutil -i "$OSS_AK" -k "$OSS_SK" -e "$OSS_ENDPOINT" \
cp -f "${candidate}.context" "$context_file" >/dev/null 2>&1; then
if raw_retry_after_epoch="$(jq -ser '
select(length == 1)
| .[0]
| select(type == "object"
and .version == 1
and .state == "usage_limited"
and (.retry_after_epoch | type == "number" and floor == .))
| .retry_after_epoch
' "$context_file" 2>/dev/null)" && \
retry_after_epoch="$(date -u -d "@$raw_retry_after_epoch" +%s 2>/dev/null)"; then
if [ "$retry_after_epoch" -gt "$now_epoch" ]; then
retry_at="$(date -u -d "@$retry_after_epoch" +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)"
echo "Skipping usage-limited Codex auth ${candidate##*/} until $retry_at."
if [ -z "$earliest_retry_after_epoch" ] || \
[ "$retry_after_epoch" -lt "$earliest_retry_after_epoch" ]; then
earliest_retry_after_epoch="$retry_after_epoch"
fi
continue
fi
else
echo "::warning::Ignoring unusable Codex auth context for ${candidate##*/}; the account remains eligible."
fi
fi
candidate_auth="$(mktemp "$RUNNER_TEMP/codex-home/candidate-auth.XXXXXX")"
ossutil -i "$OSS_AK" -k "$OSS_SK" -e "$OSS_ENDPOINT" cp -f "$candidate" "$candidate_auth"
jq -e '
.auth_mode == "chatgpt"
and (.tokens.access_token | type == "string" and length > 0)
and (.tokens.refresh_token | type == "string" and length > 0)
' "$candidate_auth" >/dev/null
refresh_token_hash="$(jq -rj '.tokens.refresh_token' "$candidate_auth" | sha256sum | awk '{print $1}')"
# Quarantine the refresh token, not the slot or the entire auth file:
# replacing the token restores eligibility; changing metadata does not.
invalid_object="${candidate}.invalid.${refresh_token_hash}"
invalid_listing="$(mktemp "$RUNNER_TEMP/codex-auth-invalid.XXXXXX")"
if ! ossutil -i "$OSS_AK" -k "$OSS_SK" -e "$OSS_ENDPOINT" \
ls "$invalid_object" -s > "$invalid_listing"; then
auth_failure_reason="Failed to check invalid-token marker for ${candidate##*/}."
echo "failure_reason=$auth_failure_reason" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
echo "::error::$auth_failure_reason"
exit 1
fi
if grep -Fxq "$invalid_object" "$invalid_listing"; then
echo "Skipping Codex auth ${candidate##*/}: refresh token was already used."
rm -f "$candidate_auth"
continue
fi
auth_object="$candidate"
# Use the checked snapshot; downloading it again could select a different token.
mv "$candidate_auth" "$RUNNER_TEMP/codex-home/auth.json"
printf '%s\n' "$refresh_token_hash" > "$RUNNER_TEMP/codex-auth-refresh-token.sha256"
break
done < <(shuf "$auth_candidates")
if [ -z "$auth_object" ]; then
auth_failure_reason="No eligible Codex review credentials: all are usage-limited or have a reused refresh token."
if [ -n "$earliest_retry_after_epoch" ]; then
retry_at="$(date -u -d "@$earliest_retry_after_epoch" +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)"
auth_failure_reason="$auth_failure_reason Earliest usage-limit retry is $retry_at."
fi
auth_failure_reason="$auth_failure_reason Credentials with reused refresh tokens must be replaced."
echo "failure_reason=$auth_failure_reason" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
echo "::error::$auth_failure_reason"
exit 1
fi
printf 'CODEX_AUTH_OSS_OBJECT=%s\n' "$auth_object" >> "$GITHUB_ENV"
echo "Selected Codex auth object: ${auth_object##*/}"
chmod 600 "$RUNNER_TEMP/codex-home/auth.json"
sha256sum "$RUNNER_TEMP/codex-home/auth.json" \
| awk '{print $1}' \
> "$RUNNER_TEMP/codex-auth-original.sha256"
cat > "$RUNNER_TEMP/codex-home/config.toml" <<EOF
cli_auth_credentials_store = "file"
approval_policy = "never"
[features]
memories = true
[memories]
use_memories = true
generate_memories = true
[shell_environment_policy]
inherit = "all"
[otel]
environment = "github-actions"
exporter = "none"
metrics_exporter = "none"
trace_exporter = "none"
EOF
chmod 600 "$RUNNER_TEMP/codex-home/config.toml"
env:
OSS_AK: ${{ secrets.OSS_AK }}
OSS_SK: ${{ secrets.OSS_SK }}
OSS_ENDPOINT: oss-cn-hongkong.aliyuncs.com
- name: Sync Codex memories from OSS
timeout-minutes: 5
run: |
install -m 700 -d "$CODEX_HOME/memories"
archive="$RUNNER_TEMP/codex-memories.tar.gz"
listing="$RUNNER_TEMP/codex-memories.list"
if ossutil -i "$OSS_AK" -k "$OSS_SK" -e "$OSS_ENDPOINT" cp -f "$OSS_CODEX_MEMORIES_OBJECT" "$archive"; then
if [ -s "$archive" ]; then
tar -tzf "$archive" > "$listing"
if [ -s "$listing" ]; then
awk '
$0 != "memories" && $0 != "memories/" && $0 !~ /^memories\// { bad = 1 }
END { exit bad }
' "$listing"
tar -xzf "$archive" -C "$CODEX_HOME"
else
echo "Codex memories archive is empty; continuing with empty memories."
fi
else
echo "Codex memories archive is empty; continuing with empty memories."
fi
else
echo "No Codex memories archive could be downloaded; continuing with empty memories."
fi
install -m 700 -d "$CODEX_HOME/memories"
touch "$CODEX_HOME/memories/memory_summary.md"
chmod -R go-rwx "$CODEX_HOME/memories" || true
env:
OSS_AK: ${{ secrets.OSS_AK }}
OSS_SK: ${{ secrets.OSS_SK }}
OSS_ENDPOINT: oss-cn-hongkong.aliyuncs.com
OSS_CODEX_MEMORIES_OBJECT: oss://doris-community-ci/memories.tar.gz
- name: Prepare review context directory
timeout-minutes: 2
run: |
review_context_dir="$(mktemp -d "$GITHUB_WORKSPACE/.code-review.XXXXXX")"
review_context_rel="$(basename "$review_context_dir")"
printf 'REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR=%s\n' "$review_context_dir" >> "$GITHUB_ENV"
printf 'REVIEW_CONTEXT_REL=%s\n' "$review_context_rel" >> "$GITHUB_ENV"
- name: Fetch existing PR review threads
timeout-minutes: 5
env:
GH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
REPO: ${{ github.repository }}
PR_NUMBER: ${{ steps.review_inputs.outputs.pr_number }}
run: |
MAX_THREADS=30
MAX_BODY_CHARS=1200
if python3 "$REVIEW_GH_HELPER" api --paginate --slurp repos/${REPO}/pulls/${PR_NUMBER}/comments > "$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/pr_review_comments_pages.json" 2>"$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/pr_review_comments_error.log" \
&& jq 'add | sort_by((.in_reply_to_id // .id), .id)' "$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/pr_review_comments_pages.json" > "$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/pr_review_comments.json" 2>>"$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/pr_review_comments_error.log" \
&& jq -r '
def shorten($limit):
if (. // "" | length) > $limit then
.[0:$limit] + "...(truncated)"
else
. // ""
end;
if length == 0 then
"No existing inline review comments or replies were found for this PR."
else
group_by(.in_reply_to_id // .id)
| sort_by(.[0].created_at // "")
| reverse
| .[:$max_threads]
| map(
. as $thread
| $thread[0] as $root
| "### " + ($root.path // "(unknown path)") + ":" + (($root.line // $root.original_line // "n/a") | tostring)
+ "\nURL: " + ($root.html_url // "")
+ "\nComments:\n"
+ (
$thread
| map(
"- " + (.user.login // "unknown")
+ " at " + (.created_at // "")
+ (if .in_reply_to_id then " (reply):" else " (original comment):" end)
+ "\n"
+ ((.body | shorten($max_body_chars)) | split("\n") | map(" " + .) | join("\n"))
)
| join("\n")
)
)
| join("\n\n")
end
' --argjson max_threads "$MAX_THREADS" --argjson max_body_chars "$MAX_BODY_CHARS" "$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/pr_review_comments.json" > "$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/pr_review_threads.md" 2>>"$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/pr_review_comments_error.log"; then
echo "Fetched existing PR review threads successfully."
else
printf '%s\n\n' \
'Existing PR review threads could not be fetched or formatted for this run.' \
'Proceed with the automated review without this auxiliary context.' \
> "$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/pr_review_threads.md"
if [ -s "$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/pr_review_comments_error.log" ]; then
{
printf '\n%s\n' 'Fetch/format error details:'
sed 's/^/ /' "$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/pr_review_comments_error.log"
} >> "$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/pr_review_threads.md"
fi
fi
- name: Prepare user review focus
timeout-minutes: 2
env:
REVIEW_FOCUS: ${{ steps.review_inputs.outputs.review_focus }}
run: |
if [ -n "$(printf '%s' "$REVIEW_FOCUS" | tr -d '[:space:]')" ]; then
printf '%s\n' "$REVIEW_FOCUS" > "$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/review_focus.txt"
else
printf 'No additional user-provided review focus.\n' > "$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/review_focus.txt"
fi
- name: Prepare authoritative PR context and required AGENTS guides
id: review_context
timeout-minutes: 10
env:
GH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
REPO: ${{ github.repository }}
PR_NUMBER: ${{ steps.review_inputs.outputs.pr_number }}
HEAD_SHA: ${{ steps.review_inputs.outputs.head_sha }}
BASE_SHA: ${{ steps.review_inputs.outputs.base_sha }}
HELPER_REF: ${{ github.workflow_sha || github.sha }}
run: |
checkout_head_sha="$(git rev-parse HEAD)"
if [ "$checkout_head_sha" != "$HEAD_SHA" ]; then
echo "Checked-out HEAD $checkout_head_sha does not match expected PR head $HEAD_SHA"
exit 1
fi
live_pr="$(python3 "$REVIEW_GH_HELPER" api "repos/${REPO}/pulls/${PR_NUMBER}")"
live_head_sha="$(jq -r '.head.sha' <<<"$live_pr")"
live_base_sha="$(jq -r '.base.sha' <<<"$live_pr")"
live_base_ref="$(jq -er '.base.ref' <<<"$live_pr")"
if [ "$live_head_sha" != "$HEAD_SHA" ] || [ "$live_base_sha" != "$BASE_SHA" ]; then
echo "PR changed while review context was being prepared; restart the review"
echo "Expected base/head: $BASE_SHA $HEAD_SHA"
echo "Current base/head: $live_base_sha $live_head_sha"
exit 1
fi
if [ "$(git rev-parse --is-shallow-repository)" != "false" ]; then
echo "Full history is required to generate an authoritative three-dot PR diff"
exit 1
fi
diff_range="${BASE_SHA}...${HEAD_SHA}"
merge_base_sha="$(git merge-base "$BASE_SHA" "$HEAD_SHA")"
echo "Generating review context from $diff_range (merge base: $merge_base_sha)"
git rev-list --count "${merge_base_sha}..${HEAD_SHA}"
changed_files_tmp="$(mktemp "$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/pr_changed_files.txt.tmp.XXXXXX")"
git diff --name-only --no-ext-diff "$diff_range" > "$changed_files_tmp"
mv "$changed_files_tmp" "$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/pr_changed_files.txt"
diff_tmp="$(mktemp "$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/pr.diff.tmp.XXXXXX")"
git diff --no-ext-diff --no-color "$diff_range" > "$diff_tmp"
mv "$diff_tmp" "$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/pr.diff"
git diff --shortstat "$diff_range"
helper="$RUNNER_TEMP/prepare_review_agents.py"
python3 "$REVIEW_GH_HELPER" api \
-H "Accept: application/vnd.github.raw" \
"repos/${REPO}/contents/.github/scripts/prepare_review_agents.py?ref=${HELPER_REF}" \
> "$helper"
chmod 700 "$helper"
python3 "$helper" \
--changed-files "$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/pr_changed_files.txt" \
--required-agents "$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/required_agents.txt" \
--prompt-block "$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/required_agents_prompt.txt" \
--base-ref "$live_base_ref" \
--trusted-ref "$HELPER_REF" \
--skill-prompt-block "$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/review_skill_prompt.txt"
echo "Required AGENTS.md files for this review:"
sed 's/^/ /' "$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/required_agents.txt"
- name: Prepare review prompt
timeout-minutes: 5
run: |
cat > "$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/review_prompt.txt" <<'PROMPT'
You are performing an automated code review inside a GitHub Actions runner. The gh CLI is available and authenticated via GH_TOKEN.
The current directory is the code repository for the PR to be reviewed.
This environment is only used for review operations, so do not attempt any builds or code modifications. However, temporary scripts you use for review purposes are exceptions.
You MUST NOT attempt to access any files outside the current directory. and you DO NOT need to. But this does not prevent you from normally using any skill or web fetch tools.
You can comment on the pull request.
This review task is executed in Codex goal mode. The goal is to deliver one verified GitHub review within at most 3 review rounds, with an explicit convergence result. Delivery and convergence are separate: a review that reaches the round limit MUST still deliver its verified findings and describe its remaining limits. Follow this bounded delivery contract for stopping and submission.
A review is converged only when all assigned subagents in the latest round return NO_NEW_VALUABLE_FINDINGS, the required coverage is complete, and every candidate and risk focus has been verified and accepted, deduplicated, or dismissed with evidence. Otherwise continue until round 3. At round 3, perform the final sweep and submit with converged=false if any of these conditions still fail; do not start a fourth round, wait for an override, or mark the goal blocked solely because convergence was not reached.
Context:
- Repository: PLACEHOLDER_REPO
- PR number: PLACEHOLDER_PR_NUMBER
- PR Head SHA: PLACEHOLDER_HEAD_SHA
- PR Base SHA: PLACEHOLDER_BASE_SHA
- Existing inline review threads: PLACEHOLDER_CONTEXT_DIR/pr_review_threads.md
- Raw inline review comments JSON: PLACEHOLDER_CONTEXT_DIR/pr_review_comments.json
- User review focus: PLACEHOLDER_CONTEXT_DIR/review_focus.txt
- PR changed files: PLACEHOLDER_CONTEXT_DIR/pr_changed_files.txt
- Authoritative aggregate PR diff: PLACEHOLDER_CONTEXT_DIR/pr.diff
- PR diff range: merge-base(PLACEHOLDER_BASE_SHA, PLACEHOLDER_HEAD_SHA) to PLACEHOLDER_HEAD_SHA
- Required AGENTS.md files: PLACEHOLDER_CONTEXT_DIR/required_agents.txt
- Shared subagent review ledger: PLACEHOLDER_CONTEXT_DIR/subagent_review_findings.md
PR diff and path-reading (for all subagents and the main agent):
- PLACEHOLDER_CONTEXT_DIR/pr.diff and PLACEHOLDER_CONTEXT_DIR/pr_changed_files.txt were both generated locally with `git diff PLACEHOLDER_BASE_SHA...PLACEHOLDER_HEAD_SHA` after the live PR base/head were verified. They are the authoritative PR diff and changed-path list: they contain changes from the computed merge base to the PR head. The listed PR Base SHA identifies the target-branch snapshot and is not necessarily the diff's left endpoint. Do not obtain the PR diff or changed-path list through other means.
- Before reading any file whose exact path is not already confirmed by this prompt, the selected skill's AGENTS.md references, PLACEHOLDER_CONTEXT_DIR/pr_changed_files.txt, PLACEHOLDER_CONTEXT_DIR/pr.diff, or a previous successful command output, you MUST first run `rg --files` to confirm the actual path of the target file.
PLACEHOLDER_REVIEW_SKILL_BLOCK
The active review goal's progress tracking MUST include, and must stay current throughout the review:
1. Read the review prompt, code-review skill, required AGENTS.md files, existing review threads, user focus, changed-file list, and the shared subagent review ledger.
2. Perform a main-agent initial risk scan before spawning review subagents. You must thoroughly read all the changes in this PR and understand all the involved mechanisms, pointing out: if there is a problem with this PR, where is the problem most likely to be? Or are there any points you suspect to be risky? write the result under `## Main Initial Risk Scan` in the shared ledger.
3. Based on the requirements of the code-review skill regarding the coverage points of the review spawn 1-3 subagents (depends on the complexity of the PR), each focusing on certain aspects. The sum of their focus points must fully cover the entire content of PR, as well as the points required in skill and any additional review points you consider necessary. Each subagent must investigate its assigned scope within the bounded review process, report every substantiated finding, and explicitly identify any remaining uncertainty or coverage gaps. You need assign each subagent a dedicated section in the shared ledger.
4. If the main initial risk scan identifies one or more suspicious mechanisms, spawn additional risk-focused subagent(s), separate from the normal complete-review subagents, to specially investigate those specific mechanisms and their upstream/downstream interactions.
5. Read the shared ledger after every subagent result, independently verify and deduplicate candidates, and classify each as accepted, already covered, dismissed with evidence, or unresolved with a concrete remaining question. Keep unresolved candidates out of the inline findings until verified.
6. After each round, evaluate the convergence conditions above. If they hold, or if 3 rounds have executed, perform the final sweep and deliver the review using the trusted submission helper. At the round limit, publish all verified findings even if the review did not converge, and explicitly describe unresolved candidates or coverage limits. Otherwise continue the next round without resetting the shared ledger or round count.
7. Submit the GitHub review and verify that all accepted findings landed before marking the bounded delivery goal complete. Address the required skill checkpoints and user concerns, and report convergence separately. A verified non-converged delivery completes this execution while leaving the review check blocked.
Subagent Constraints:
- Every subagent appends only to its assigned ledger section, while reading the whole ledger to avoid duplicate candidates.
- Follow the principles indicated in the code-review skill.
- The shared subagent review ledger is PLACEHOLDER_CONTEXT_DIR/subagent_review_findings.md. Subagents must read the whole ledger before reviewing, avoid duplicating existing candidates, and append their findings only under their assigned subagent section. They must not rewrite the whole ledger, edit another subagent section, edit the main merged sections, edit repository source files, or submit GitHub comments.
- Each subagent must record candidate findings in its own ledger section with stable IDs, path/line, claim, evidence, duplicate relationship if any, and recommendation. Do not add duplicates of existing items. This section-owned append-only rule is mandatory to avoid concurrent patch conflicts.
- Before returning, a further thought must be made—what problem, if any, might I have missed just now, and where? Then a thorough recheck should be conducted to confirm whether this potential issue is real and whether it needs to be reported.
Main-agent Constraints:
- Before delivery, every suspicious point must have an explicit disposition in the ledger: a verified finding, already covered by an existing review, dismissed with concrete evidence, or unresolved. At round 3, disclose unresolved points as remaining questions in the summary and incomplete_reason; they prevent convergence but MUST NOT prevent delivery of verified findings.
- The main initial risk scan MUST be written under `## Main Initial Risk Scan` in the shared ledger before any subagent is spawned. For every risk focus item, include: ID, changed files/lines involved, related mechanisms to inspect, why it is suspicious, required upstream/downstream files or paths, and the exact question the risk-focused subagent must answer.
- The shared subagent review ledger is PLACEHOLDER_CONTEXT_DIR/subagent_review_findings.md. Before spawning any subagent, the main agent MUST read this ledger. Every subagent prompt MUST include this ledger path and the exact ledger section assigned to that subagent.
- The main agent must read the shared ledger after each subagent result, merge duplicate candidates into the main merged section, update candidate statuses, and keep a proposed final comment set in the main-owned ledger sections. It must also update the status of every main risk focus item.
- Before submitting, do one final sweep over the changed-file list, candidate dispositions, and risk focus items. Confirm the evidence and anchors for every accepted finding and record any remaining coverage gaps. This sweep must respect the three-round limit. Remaining uncertainty at the cap sets converged=false and must be disclosed; do not claim it has been resolved or withhold the verified review.
Any agent MUST NOT stop after finding the first blocking issue. Within the three-round limit, keep reviewing changed files, related control flow, tests, and parallel/special-case paths. Publish every verified bug and explicitly disclose remaining uncertainty at the limit.
Before inspecting the PR diff or related code, you MUST read the contents of every AGENTS.md file listed below. These paths are computed from the PR changed file ancestors in this checkout. Searching for or listing paths is not sufficient; read each listed file directly.
Required AGENTS.md files for this PR:
PLACEHOLDER_REQUIRED_AGENTS_BLOCK
Before proposing any new issue, you MUST read PLACEHOLDER_CONTEXT_DIR/pr_review_threads.md and treat every existing inline comment thread and reply as already-known review context.
Do NOT submit the same or substantially similar issue again if it has already been raised in the existing review threads, even if you would phrase it differently. Only raise a similar concern when the PR introduces a genuinely different instance in another location that is not already covered by the existing thread, and explain why it is distinct.
You MUST also read PLACEHOLDER_CONTEXT_DIR/review_focus.txt. Perform a complete review of the whole PR as usual, and additionally pay special attention to the user-provided focus points from that file. In the final summary, include a short response to the user focus points, including when no additional issue was found for them.
In addition, you can perform any desired review operations to observe suspicious code and details in order to identify issues as much as possible.
## Final response format
- On delivery, provide a final summary opinion addressing every applicable critical checkpoint, user concerns, and any remaining coverage limits. State whether the review converged.
- After convergence or the third round and final sweep, declare the full set of verified findings for this invocation in a JSON file with exactly these fields:
{"body":"<comprehensive summary>","comments":[{"path":"<file>","position":<diff_position>,"body":"[P1] <finding title and explanation>"}],"existing_blocking_comment_ids":[],"converged":true,"rounds":1,"incomplete_reason":""}
- Every new finding must be inline and start with [P0], [P1], [P2] or [P3]. Suggested changes are welcome for precise, self-contained fixes.
- Include ALL accepted new findings in comments. Use an empty array when there are none. In existing_blocking_comment_ids, list the numeric IDs of every already-reported P0/P1 inline finding you independently confirmed still applies to this head. Do not duplicate those findings. Explain their disposition in the summary; use an empty array only if none still apply.
- Set rounds to the actual total (1 through 3), never reset it on resume. Set converged=true only when all convergence conditions hold and use an empty incomplete_reason. At the cap without convergence, set converged=false, rounds=3, and a nonempty incomplete_reason explaining which conditions failed, remaining questions, and uncovered scope. Deliver in either case using the trusted helper: python3 "$RUNNER_TEMP/submit_review.py" --context-dir PLACEHOLDER_CONTEXT_DIR --input-file <json_file>
- The helper pins the head, adds this invocation's delivery marker and convergence statement, and verifies the summary and inline set. P0/P1 results request changes; other deliveries are comments. A non-converged delivery blocks the review check even with zero P0/P1. This is the ONLY GitHub submission path; do not submit reviews or inline comments directly with gh.
- If the helper reports an error, inspect it and verify the outcome before proceeding. Do not change or delete its review-run.json or review-submission.json files. A retry with the identical JSON reads back a submitted review instead of posting it again.
- Mark the bounded delivery goal complete only after the helper reports the verified review ID, including a non-converged delivery after round 3. The workflow applies the separate blocking verdict. A changed PR head, an unverified submission, or a helper error still prevents successful delivery.
PROMPT
sed -i "s|PLACEHOLDER_REPO|${REPO}|g" "$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/review_prompt.txt"
sed -i "s|PLACEHOLDER_PR_NUMBER|${PR_NUMBER}|g" "$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/review_prompt.txt"
sed -i "s|PLACEHOLDER_HEAD_SHA|${HEAD_SHA}|g" "$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/review_prompt.txt"
sed -i "s|PLACEHOLDER_BASE_SHA|${BASE_SHA}|g" "$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/review_prompt.txt"
sed -i "s|PLACEHOLDER_CONTEXT_DIR|${REVIEW_CONTEXT_REL}|g" "$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/review_prompt.txt"
python3 - "$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/review_prompt.txt" "$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/required_agents_prompt.txt" "$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/review_skill_prompt.txt" <<'PY'
import sys
from pathlib import Path
prompt_path = Path(sys.argv[1])
required_agents_path = Path(sys.argv[2])
prompt = prompt_path.read_text()
required_agents = required_agents_path.read_text().rstrip()
skill_instructions = Path(sys.argv[3]).read_text().rstrip()
prompt = prompt.replace("PLACEHOLDER_REQUIRED_AGENTS_BLOCK", required_agents)
prompt_path.write_text(prompt.replace("PLACEHOLDER_REVIEW_SKILL_BLOCK", skill_instructions))
PY
cat > "$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/subagent_review_findings.md" <<'LEDGER'
# Shared Subagent Review Ledger
This is the shared source of truth for subagent-assisted review.
Rules:
- Subagents must read this whole file before reviewing.
- Each subagent may append only to its assigned section under `Subagent Candidate Sections`.
- Subagents must not rewrite this file, edit another subagent section, edit main-owned sections, edit repository source files, or submit GitHub comments.
- Avoid duplicates. If a candidate overlaps an existing candidate, add a duplicate note in your own section that references the existing candidate ID.
- The main agent owns final status, final deduplication, GitHub review submission, and GitHub API verification.
## Main Initial Risk Scan
Main-owned format:
- ID:
Status:
Changed files/lines:
Related mechanisms to inspect:
Why suspicious:
Required upstream/downstream files or paths:
Question for risk-focused subagent:
Final conclusion:
Candidate statuses:
- proposed_by_subagent
- accepted_for_inline_comment
- dismissed_with_evidence
- duplicated
Candidate format:
- ID:
Owner:
Status:
Path:
Line:
Claim:
Evidence:
Duplicate relationship:
Recommendation:
## Main Merged Findings
Main-owned format:
- ID:
Source IDs:
Owner: main
Status:
Path:
Line:
Claim:
Evidence:
Duplicate relationship:
Main verification:
Proposed inline body:
## Dismissed Or Duplicate Points
## Proposed Final Comment Set
## Convergence Rounds
LEDGER
cat > "$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/codex_goal_prompt.txt" <<EOF
You are performing an automated code review inside a GitHub Actions runner.
This invocation is already running in Codex goal mode. Before inspecting the PR diff or related code, read ${REVIEW_CONTEXT_REL}/review_prompt.txt verbatim and follow that file as the complete review instruction set.
This document outlines the complete process, cyclic procedures, and exit agreements you need to follow. Please read it seriously and reconfirm the requirements at the end of each cycle. Complete the review according to the stipulations in this document.
EOF
env:
REPO: ${{ github.repository }}
PR_NUMBER: ${{ steps.review_inputs.outputs.pr_number }}
HEAD_SHA: ${{ steps.review_inputs.outputs.head_sha }}
BASE_SHA: ${{ steps.review_inputs.outputs.base_sha }}
- name: Run automated code review
id: review
timeout-minutes: ${{ fromJSON(env.REVIEW_TIMEOUT_MINUTES) }}
continue-on-error: true
env:
GH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
REPO: ${{ github.repository }}
PR_NUMBER: ${{ steps.review_inputs.outputs.pr_number }}
HEAD_SHA: ${{ steps.review_inputs.outputs.head_sha }}
BASE_SHA: ${{ steps.review_inputs.outputs.base_sha }}
HELPER_REF: ${{ github.workflow_sha || github.sha }}
run: |
review_step_started_at=$SECONDS
for script in run_review_with_resume.py submit_review.py; do
python3 "$REVIEW_GH_HELPER" api \
-H "Accept: application/vnd.github.raw" \
"repos/${REPO}/contents/.github/scripts/${script}?ref=${HELPER_REF}" \
> "$RUNNER_TEMP/$script"
done
helper="$RUNNER_TEMP/run_review_with_resume.py"
# Share the step's budget; reserve two minutes for process cleanup and
# GitHub review verification. Both helper downloads count too.
budget_seconds=$((REVIEW_TIMEOUT_MINUTES * 60 - (SECONDS - review_step_started_at) - 120))
set +e
# GitHub-hosted runners are ephemeral. Avoid workspace-write here because
# Codex uses bubblewrap for that mode and uid maps can be unavailable.
python3 "$helper" \
--context-dir "$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR" \
--cwd "$GITHUB_WORKSPACE" \
--repository "$REPO" \
--pr-number "$PR_NUMBER" \
--head-sha "$HEAD_SHA" \
--base-sha "$BASE_SHA" \
--model "gpt-6.1-sol" \
--fallback-model "gpt-6-sol" \
--effort xhigh \
--budget-seconds "$budget_seconds"
status=$?
set -e
# The runner has stopped Codex and reaped descendants. Treat an
# obsolete head as a handled outcome, without publishing a verdict.
if [ "$status" -eq 75 ]; then
jq -e --arg repo "$REPO" --arg pr "$PR_NUMBER" --arg head "$HEAD_SHA" '
.state == "superseded" and .repository == $repo and
(.pr_number | tostring) == $pr and .head_sha == $head and
(.superseding_head_sha | test("^[0-9a-f]{40}$")) and
.superseding_head_sha != $head' \
"$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/review-result.json" > /dev/null
echo "review_state=superseded" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
jq -r '.message' "$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/review-result.json" | tee -a "$GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY"
exit 0
fi
failure_reason=""
if [ "$status" -ne 0 ]; then
if [ -s "$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/codex-events.jsonl" ]; then
failure_reason="$(jq -r 'select(.type == "turn.failed") | .error.message // empty' "$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/codex-events.jsonl" | tail -n 1)"
if [ -z "$failure_reason" ]; then
failure_reason="$(jq -r 'select(.type == "error") | .message // .error.message // empty' "$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/codex-events.jsonl" | tail -n 1)"
fi
fi
if [ -z "$failure_reason" ] && [ -s "$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/codex-stderr.log" ]; then
failure_reason="$(awk 'NF { line = $0 } END { print line }' "$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/codex-stderr.log")"
fi
if [ -z "$failure_reason" ]; then
failure_reason="Codex exited with status $status"
fi
# Only terminal auth errors and Codex's own stderr identify an invalid
# token. A tool result quoting this error must not quarantine credentials.
if grep -Fqi "Your access token could not be refreshed because your refresh token was already used." <<<"$failure_reason" || \
grep -Fxq "refresh_token_reused" <<<"$failure_reason" || \
{ jq -r 'select(.type == "turn.failed" or .type == "error") | .error.code // .code // empty' \
"$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/codex-events.jsonl" | grep -Fx "refresh_token_reused" >/dev/null; } || \
grep -Eq '"code"[[:space:]]*:[[:space:]]*"refresh_token_reused"' "$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/codex-stderr.log"; then
echo "auth_invalid_reason=refresh_token_reused" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
echo "::warning::Codex refresh token was already used; recording this credential version as invalid."
fi
usage_limit_retry_after_epoch=""
if grep -Fqi "You've hit your usage limit" <<<"$failure_reason"; then
now_epoch="$(date +%s)"
retry_at_text="$(sed -nE \
's/.*[Tt]ry again at (([A-Za-z]{3} [0-9]{1,2}(st|nd|rd|th)?, [0-9]{4} )?[0-9]{1,2}:[0-9]{2} (AM|PM)).*/\1/p' \
<<<"$failure_reason")"
if [ -n "$retry_at_text" ]; then
retry_at_text="$(sed -E 's/([0-9])(st|nd|rd|th),/\1,/' <<<"$retry_at_text")"
usage_limit_retry_after_epoch="$(date -u -d "$retry_at_text" +%s 2>/dev/null || true)"
fi
if [ -z "$usage_limit_retry_after_epoch" ] || \
[ "$usage_limit_retry_after_epoch" -le "$now_epoch" ]; then
usage_limit_retry_after_epoch="$((now_epoch + 30 * 60))"
echo "::warning::Codex usage limit had no usable future retry time; using the explicit 30-minute fallback."
fi
retry_at="$(date -u -d "@$usage_limit_retry_after_epoch" +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)"
echo "Codex usage limit detected; account retry time is $retry_at."
echo "usage_limit_retry_after_epoch=$usage_limit_retry_after_epoch" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
fi
fi
if [ -n "$failure_reason" ]; then
{
echo "failure_reason<<EOF"
printf '%s\n' "$failure_reason"
echo "EOF"
} >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
exit 1
fi
# Execution succeeded even when verified findings block the PR check.
# This result is written only after the runner's own API readback.
jq -er 'select(.state == "success" or .state == "failure") |
"review_state=\(.state)\np0=\(.p0)\np1=\(.p1)\nconverged=\(.converged)\nrounds=\(.rounds)"' \
"$REVIEW_CONTEXT_DIR/review-result.json" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"