|
1 | 1 | # States |
2 | 2 |
|
3 | | -**Note:** This AEP has not yet been adopted. See |
4 | | -[this GitHub issue](https://github.com/aep-dev/aep.dev/issues/30) for more |
5 | | -information. |
| 3 | +Many API resources carry a concept of "state": ordinarily, the resource's place |
| 4 | +in its lifecycle. For example, a virtual machine may be being provisioned, |
| 5 | +available for use, being spun down, or potentially be in one of several other |
| 6 | +situations. A job or query may be preparing to run, be actively running, have |
| 7 | +completed, and so on. |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +## Guidance |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +Resources needing to communicate their state **should** use an enum, which |
| 12 | +**should** be called `State` (or, if more specificity is required, end in the |
| 13 | +word `State`). This enum **should** be nested within the message it describes |
| 14 | +when only used as a field within that message. |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +**Important:** We use the term `State`, and _not_ `Status` (which is reserved |
| 17 | +for the HTTP and gRPC statuses). |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +### Enum values |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +Ideally, APIs use the same terminology throughout when expressing the same |
| 22 | +semantic concepts. There are usually many words available to express a given |
| 23 | +state, but our customers often use multiple APIs together, and it is easier for |
| 24 | +them when our terms are consistent. |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +At a high level: |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | +- Resources that are available for use are `ACTIVE` (preferred over terms such |
| 29 | + as "ready" or "available"). |
| 30 | +- Resources that have completed a (usually terminal) requested action use past |
| 31 | + participles (usually ending in `-ED`), such as `SUCCEEDED` (not |
| 32 | + "successful"), `FAILED` (not "failure"), `DELETED`, `SUSPENDED`, and so on. |
| 33 | +- Resources that are currently undergoing a state change use present |
| 34 | + participles (usually ending in `-ING`), such as `RUNNING`, `CREATING`, |
| 35 | + `DELETING`, and so on. In this case, it is expected that the state is |
| 36 | + temporary and will resolve to another state on its own, with no further user |
| 37 | + action. |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +**Note:** Only add states that are useful to customers. Exposing a |
| 40 | +large number of states simply because they exist in your internal system is |
| 41 | +unnecessary and adds confusion for customers. Each state **must** come with a |
| 42 | +use case for why it is necessary. |
| 43 | + |
| 44 | +### Output only |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | +The field referencing the `State` enum in a resource **must** behave and be |
| 47 | +documented as "Output only", in accordance with |
| 48 | +[field behavior documentation](./field-behavior-documentation). |
| 49 | + |
| 50 | +APIs **must not** allow a `State` enum to be directly updated through an |
| 51 | +"update" method (or directly set through the "create" method), and **must** |
| 52 | +instead use custom state transition methods. |
| 53 | + |
| 54 | +This is because update methods are generally not expected to have side effects, |
| 55 | +and also because updating state directly implies that it is possible to set the |
| 56 | +state to any available value, whereas states generally reflect a resource's |
| 57 | +progression through a lifecycle. |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | +### State transition methods |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | +State transition methods are a special type of |
| 62 | +[custom method](./custom-methods) that are responsible for transitioning a |
| 63 | +state field from one enum value to another. As part of the transition, other |
| 64 | +fields may also change, e.g. an `update_time` field. In addition to the general |
| 65 | +guidance for custom methods on resources, the following guidance applies for |
| 66 | +method definitions: |
| 67 | + |
| 68 | +- The name of the method **should** be a verb followed by the singular form of |
| 69 | + the resource's message name. |
| 70 | +- The HTTP verb **must** be `POST`. |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | +In addition to the general guidance for custom methods on resources, the |
| 73 | +following guidance applies for request definitions: |
| 74 | + |
| 75 | +- A resource path field **must** be included. It **should** be called `path`. |
| 76 | +- The comment for the field **should** document the resource pattern. |
| 77 | +- Other fields **may** be included. |
| 78 | + |
| 79 | +{% tab proto %} |
| 80 | + |
| 81 | +```proto |
| 82 | +// Publishes a book. |
| 83 | +// The `state` of the book after publishing is `PUBLISHED`. |
| 84 | +// `PublishBook` can be called on Books in the state `DRAFT`; Books in a |
| 85 | +// different state (including `PUBLISHED`) returns an error. |
| 86 | +rpc PublishBook(PublishBookRequest) returns (Book) { |
| 87 | + option (google.api.http) = { |
| 88 | + post: "/v1/{path=publishers/*/books/*}:publish" |
| 89 | + body: "*" |
| 90 | + }; |
| 91 | +} |
| 92 | +``` |
| 93 | + |
| 94 | +- The request message **must** match the RPC name, with a `Request` suffix. |
| 95 | +- The response message **should** be the resource itself. |
| 96 | + - If the RPC is [long-running](./lro), the response message **should** be an |
| 97 | + `aep.api.Operation` which resolves to the resource itself. |
| 98 | +- The `body` clause in the `google.api.http` annotation **must** be `"*"`. |
| 99 | +- The request message field receiving the resource path **should** map to the |
| 100 | + URI path. |
| 101 | + - This field **should** be called `path`. |
| 102 | + - The `path` field **should** be the only variable in the URI path. All |
| 103 | + remaining parameters **should** map to URI query parameters. |
| 104 | +- If the state transition is not allowed, the service **must** error with |
| 105 | + `FAILED_PRECONDITION` (HTTP 400). |
| 106 | + |
| 107 | +The request message should look like this: |
| 108 | + |
| 109 | +```proto |
| 110 | +message PublishBookRequest { |
| 111 | + // The path of the book to publish. |
| 112 | + // Format: publishers/{publisher}/books/{book} |
| 113 | + string path = 1 [ |
| 114 | + (google.api.field_behavior) = REQUIRED, |
| 115 | + (google.api.resource_reference) = { |
| 116 | + type: "library.example.com/Book" |
| 117 | + }]; |
| 118 | +} |
| 119 | +``` |
| 120 | + |
| 121 | +{% tab oas %} |
| 122 | + |
| 123 | +**Note:** OAS content not yet written. |
| 124 | + |
| 125 | +{% endtabs %} |
| 126 | + |
| 127 | +## Additional Guidance |
| 128 | + |
| 129 | +### Value uniqueness |
| 130 | + |
| 131 | +Multiple top-level enums within the same package **must** not share the same |
| 132 | +values. This is because the C++ protoc code generator flattens top-level enum |
| 133 | +values into a single namespace. |
| 134 | + |
| 135 | +State enums **should** live inside the resource definition. |
| 136 | + |
| 137 | +### Prefixes |
| 138 | + |
| 139 | +Using a `STATE_` prefix on every enum value is unnecessary. State enum values |
| 140 | +**should not** be prefixed with the enum name, except for the default value |
| 141 | +`STATE_UNSPECIFIED`. |
| 142 | + |
| 143 | +### Breaking changes |
| 144 | + |
| 145 | +**TL;DR:** Clearly communicate to users that state enums may receive new values |
| 146 | +in the future, and be conscientious about adding states to an existing enum. |
| 147 | + |
| 148 | +Even though adding states to an existing states enum _can_ break existing user |
| 149 | +code, adding states is not considered a breaking change. Consider a state with |
| 150 | +only two values: `ACTIVE` and `DELETED`. A user may add code that checks |
| 151 | +`if state == ACTIVE`, and in the else cases simply assumes the resource is |
| 152 | +deleted. If the API later adds a new state for another purpose, that code will |
| 153 | +break. |
| 154 | + |
| 155 | +API documentation **should** actively encourage users to code against state |
| 156 | +enums with the expectation that they may receive new values in the future. |
| 157 | + |
| 158 | +APIs **may** add new states to an existing State enum when appropriate, and |
| 159 | +adding a new state is _not_ considered a breaking change. |
| 160 | + |
| 161 | +### When to avoid states |
| 162 | + |
| 163 | +Sometimes, a `State` enum may not be what is best for your API, particularly in |
| 164 | +situations where a state has a very small number of potential values, or when |
| 165 | +states are not mutually exclusive. |
| 166 | + |
| 167 | +Consider the example of a state with only `ACTIVE` and `DELETED`, as discussed |
| 168 | +above. In this situation, the API may be better off exposing a |
| 169 | +`google.protobuf.Timestamp delete_time`, and instructing users to rely on |
| 170 | +whether it is set to determine deletion. |
| 171 | + |
| 172 | +### Common states |
| 173 | + |
| 174 | +The following is a list of states in common use. APIs **should** consider prior |
| 175 | +art when determining state names, and **should** value local consistency above |
| 176 | +global consistency in the case of conflicting precedent. |
| 177 | + |
| 178 | +#### Resting states |
| 179 | + |
| 180 | +"Resting states" are lifecycle states that, absent user action, are expected to |
| 181 | +remain indefinitely. However, the user can initiate an action to move a |
| 182 | +resource in a resting state into certain other states (resting or active). |
| 183 | + |
| 184 | +- `ACCEPTED` |
| 185 | +- `ACTIVE` |
| 186 | +- `CANCELLED` |
| 187 | +- `DELETED` |
| 188 | +- `FAILED` |
| 189 | +- `SUCCEEDED` |
| 190 | +- `SUSPENDED` |
| 191 | +- `VERIFIED` |
| 192 | + |
| 193 | +#### Active states |
| 194 | + |
| 195 | +"Active states" are lifecycle states that typically resolve on their own into a |
| 196 | +single expected resting state. |
| 197 | + |
| 198 | +**Note:** Remember only to expose states that are useful to customers. Active |
| 199 | +states are valuable only if the resource will be in that state for a sufficient |
| 200 | +period of time. If state changes are immediate, active states are not |
| 201 | +necessary. |
| 202 | + |
| 203 | +- `CREATING` (usually becomes `ACTIVE`) |
| 204 | +- `DELETING` (usually becomes `DELETED`) |
| 205 | +- `PENDING` (usually becomes `RUNNING`) |
| 206 | +- `REPAIRING` (usually becomes `ACTIVE`) |
| 207 | +- `RUNNING` (usually becomes `SUCCEEDED`) |
| 208 | +- `SUSPENDING` (usually becomes `SUSPENDED`) |
| 209 | + |
| 210 | +## Further reading |
| 211 | + |
| 212 | +- For information on enums generally, see [enumerations](./enumerations). |
0 commit comments