2026 05-25 15:23:02 958|Debug|IoLoopAsync|Write 6 data items: RJET-ZSP-L9-03989,41022,0,200807281,1,1
After the last writing, on-site feedback showed that the tray number remained the same as the previous data RJET-ZSP-L9-03255, not RJET-ZSP-L9-03989
Later, the task was reissued and reissued again:
2026 05-25 15:31:25 220 | Debug | IoLoopSync | Write 6 data items: RJET-ZSP-L9-038994022, 0200807281, 1,1
The data packets of the two times were identical, but the first time the tray number was not updated successfully, the second time it was successful, and the network layer PLC did not report any abnormality.
In the vast majority of cases, it is normal for occasional writes of a few thousand times to occur a few times
2026 05-25 15:23:02 958|Debug|IoLoopAsync|Write 6 data items: RJET-ZSP-L9-03989,41022,0,200807281,1,1
After the last writing, on-site feedback showed that the tray number remained the same as the previous data RJET-ZSP-L9-03255, not RJET-ZSP-L9-03989
Later, the task was reissued and reissued again:
2026 05-25 15:31:25 220 | Debug | IoLoopSync | Write 6 data items: RJET-ZSP-L9-038994022, 0200807281, 1,1
The data packets of the two times were identical, but the first time the tray number was not updated successfully, the second time it was successful, and the network layer PLC did not report any abnormality.
In the vast majority of cases, it is normal for occasional writes of a few thousand times to occur a few times