Skip to content

Evolve guidance regarding Breech management, notification, security risk assessment #11

@rwaitman

Description

@rwaitman

June 23rd conversation led by Ravi and Abel (with Russ, Ania, and Shelley)
http://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/breach-notification/index.html

The policies and regulations already exist. Many of the partners in PCORnet are covered entities.
Russ: but are all the actors acting as covered entities and following standard security risk assessments and other elements of policy and regulation?

Ravi: 3 main guideline areas (physical, IT, process)

Or if it's a patient network where they directly deposit the data, the same rules may not apply.

Where people are not covered entities but managing more than de-identified data, there may need to be guidance as best can be provided.

The way data exchanged for consented patients for adaptable may involve a transfer agreement different than a data agreement required for limited dataset transfers.

Breech depends on other defined terms of

  • parties involved (CC, CDRN, PPRN, CDRN site, data coordinating center, vendor for the coordinating center e.g. mytrus)
  • deidentified
  • consented patient or not
  • database maintained for trial
  • data infrastructure maintained by PPRN or CDRN or site/partner.
  • BAA needed or DSA needed

Russ:

  • a deliverable may be also diagramming how data is used and safeguarded in a manner that could be explained to students.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions