Is is really sensible to have 2 different pretty-printers? We currently have:
util.pformatparser.common.tree_print
I guess tree_print is specific to AST/CST nodes but still we should unify these, perhaps via some sort of extensibility or _pformat_ or similar?
See also: #76
Is is really sensible to have 2 different pretty-printers? We currently have:
util.pformatparser.common.tree_printI guess
tree_printis specific to AST/CST nodes but still we should unify these, perhaps via some sort of extensibility or_pformat_or similar?See also: #76