| RFC | RFCnnnn |
|---|---|
| Author | Kirk Munro |
| Status | Draft |
| SupercededBy | |
| Version | 0.1 |
| Area | Engine |
| Comments Due | September 15, 2019 |
| Plan to implement | true |
@jpsnover suggested in
PowerShell Issue #6010
that an [-OnError <ScriptBlock>] be added to the common parameters in
PowerShell that takes precedence over -ErrorAction and
$ErrorActionPreference. In response to that issue, PR #182 has been opened by
@TylerLeonhardt with an RFC that proposes we change the trap statement to
accommodate non-terminating errors. There are several challenges between the
original issue and the proposed RFC:
- Both designs are only for error messages. It would be more useful to be able to provide a solution that works for type of message (warning, verbose, debug, information, progress) so that everything can be handled (eg. logged) the same way.
- Blurring the line between terminating and non-terminating errors is a risky proposition. There is a reason that terminating errors are terminating. Executing code beyond a terminating error should require intentional logic to allow that to happen. The fact that the line between terminating and non-terminating errors is already blurred is a long standing problem with PowerShell (terminating errors don't actually terminate in PowerShell unless they are wrapped in try/catch, resulting in widespread use of an anti-pattern in scripts today), and any further blurring of that line risks even more mishandling of terminating errors in PowerShell than we already see today.
With those challenges in mind, this RFC proposes instead that we extend what is
allowed in -*Action common parameters, such that a ScriptBlock can be
passed into those parameters. Further, it also proposes that we allow a
ScriptBlock to be assigned to any $*Preference variable as well. This will
allow scripters and script, function and module authors to apply custom message
processing to their scripts for any type of non-terminating message that is not
silenced or ignored.
Terminating messages will remain handled by try/catch statements or trap statements the way they are defined in PowerShell 6.2 and earlier releases.
As a scripter or a script, function, or module author,
I can use a ScriptBlock with *Preference variables and -*Action
parameters,
so that I can perform custom processing for messages generated by any number of
different commands in my scripts without having to use redirection operators in
many different locations.
Here is an example that demonstrates how a scripter may handle non-terminating (as well as terminating) messages in PowerShell once this RFC is implemented:
# region Some functions used in the examples
$messageLog = [System.Collections.ArrayList]::new()
function Write-MessageLog {
[CmdletBinding(DefaultParameterSetName='Error')]
param(
[Parameter(Position=0, Mandatory=$true, ParameterSetName='Error')]
[ValidateNotNull()]
[System.Management.Automation.ErrorRecord]
$ErrorRecord,
[Parameter(Position=0, Mandatory=$true, ParameterSetName='Message')]
[ValidateNotNull()]
[System.Management.Automation.InformationRecord]
$InformationRecord
)
$messageLog.Add([pscustomobject]@{
Timestamp = [System.DateTime]::UtcNow
Message = if ($PSCmdlet.ParameterSetName -eq 'Error') {
$ErrorRecord | Out-String
} else {
$InformationRecord.Message
}
})
}
Set-StrictMode -Version Latest
function Get-MyProcess {
[CmdletBinding()]
param([int]$Id = $PID)
Write-Verbose -Verbose -Message "Looking for process with ID ${Id}..."
$process = Get-Process -Id $Id
if ($process -ne $null) {
Write-Verbose -Verbose -Message "Found process with ID ${Id}."
Write-Output "Name: $($process.DisplayName)"
Write-Output "Id: $($process.Id)"
} else {
Write-Warning -Message "Process ${Id} was not found."
}
}
#endregion
# EXAMPLE 1:
# Run the script, recording all non-terminating errors in the error log.
# Since the error action script block does not return an [ActionPreference]
# enumeration value, default error handling will occur after the message is
# written to the message log, showing the error in the terminal and writing
# it into $error.
Get-MyProcess -Id 12345678 -ErrorAction {Write-MessageLog $_}
# Run the script again, recording all messages, including verbose and debug,
# as well as any terminating or non-terminating error that occurs, in the
# message log without showing them on screen. Errors will still be stored in
# $error, as per the usual behavior of SilentlyContinue.
$ErrorActionPreference = $WarningPreference = $VerbosePreference =
$DebugPreference = {
Write-MessageLog $_
[ActionPreference]::SilentlyContinue
}
try {
Get-MyProcess
} catch {
Write-MessageLog $_
throw
}In the case of the first example, the message log used by the caller will
contain the non-terminating error raised in Get-MyProcess.
In the case of the second example, the message log will contain all warning, verbose, and debug messages, as well as any error messages, in the order in which they occurred.
This approach offers more functionality than the RFC in PR #182 without mixing up the important distinction and decisions that need to made when handing terminating and non-terminating errors.
If a ScriptBlock is present in a $*Preference variable when a message of
the appropriate type is raised, the ScriptBlock would be run with $_
assigned to the appropriate ErrorRecord or InformationalRecord instance.
These ScriptBlock instances would be used to process whatever messages they
received, and they would identify the action the scripter would like taken once
the processing is complete by returning an ActionPreference enumeration
value.
To make logging messages easier, if the ScriptBlock does not return an
ActionPreference, PowerShell would automatically apply the default
ActionPreference for that type of message (Continue for progress, warning
and error messages, SilentlyContinue for information, verbose and debug
messages).
While those two paragraphs explain the functionality simply enough, this would probably be a decent amount of work to implement.
It is important to note that this design would not be a breaking change because
today you cannot assign a ScriptBlock to a -*Action common parameter, nor
can you assign them to a $*Preference variables.
Instead of relying on a return value from any script blocks used to process
messages or errors, define an automatic variable that would contain the default
result for the appropriate message type, and that could be changed to whatever
result the user wanted. For example, a variable called $action that is of
type ActionPreference could be defined in an action handler, and script
authors who want to apply a different action preference would simply have to
assign the preference of their choice to that variable. When the script block
exits, whatever value was assigned to that $action variable would be used as
the action to take in PowerShell.
With this approach, $_ would still be assigned to the message record to
allow the ScriptBlock logic to remain as simple as possible.
The benefits of this alternative are as follows:
- The way you return an
ActionPreferencefrom theScriptBlockis a little more explicit (PowerShell will return whatever is output from theScriptBlockby default, so this makes the important part of what is returned clear). - Users who just want to log messages or perform some other handling without
mucking around with the return type can simply ignore the
$actionvariable, keeping their code simple.
The downsides to this approach are as follows:
- Some users may prefer a return
ActionPreferencevalue over a variable to work with.
PowerShell/PowerShell#10238
adds -VerboseAction, -DebugAction, and -ProgressAction common parameters
to PowerShell. These common parameters should be updated to support script
blocks as well, so that all message types can have custom processing added via
common parameters.
It is important to note that common parameters do not propagate beyond script module scope at this time, which means that handlers passed as parameters to a function defined in a script module would not process messages from commands invoked by that script module that are outside of that script module. That issue is being discussed in another RFC.