Skip to content

We think it is best to detect climate misinformation by analysing multiple most commonly used keywords #6

Description

@ricjhill

We need to decide what to detect to determine whether Climate Misinformation is present, Climate information is present, or neither is present, depending on the above assumption and what decision was made.

How you should validate the assumption:

  • do some research to understand what current solutions do.
  • outline the pros/cons/limitations of this specific approach.
  • describe the technical complexities if any.
  • if we wanted a basic POC - how long would it take?
  • What's the expected level of accuracy?
  • Once you're done - please complete ''Effort'' and ''Fit for purpose''.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    assumption validationResearch the assumption and collect evidence to determine if it is valid or not.

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions